Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 OEM and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380 OEM +532%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
400
112
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
Redwood
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy