Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
RV530
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
41W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy