Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 vs ATI Radeon X1650

AMD Radeon R9 380 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
3.476 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.476 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
217.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
RV516
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy