Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380X vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD Radeon R9 380X vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380X +6107%
3.973 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
182.4GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
40
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
124.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
3.973 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.973 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
248.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
RV620
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy