Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380X vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD Radeon R9 380X vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380X +231%
3.973 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
182.4GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
124.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
3.973 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.973 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
248.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
151W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
RV770
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy