Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 390
5.12 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +11%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Apr 2017
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
2304
160
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
160.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
5.120 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy