Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 X2 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 390 X2 +28%
5.12 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
160.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.120 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
274W
950 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
Tahiti
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy