Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 X2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 390 X2 +973%
5.12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
160.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.120 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
182W
950 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
GT200
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy