Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +4877%
7.168 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
120
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV630
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy