Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +8860%
7.168 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
80
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cedar
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy