Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +20380%
7.168 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Oct 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT216
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy