Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 52.99GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (140W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +1574%
7.168 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850 X2
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Apr 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.99GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.70 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.70 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
428.2 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.63 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV670
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy