Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY
7.168 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +96%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jun 2019
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
475W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Vega 20
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy