CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (125W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+71%
8.602 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
CMP 30HX
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Feb 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1408
256
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
TU116
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
125W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4520
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GP104
7
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro W5000
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy