Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +26781%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
40
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV620
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy