Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V5700

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +1820%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
56W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV730
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy