Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 510 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +8502%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce 510 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Sep 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GF119
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy