CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+1967%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Dec 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
128
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
G92
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
135W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4520
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
7
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V4800
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy