AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

3712 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock1468MHz

Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X +663%

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce GT 1030

1.127 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X +377%

5173

GeForce GT 1030

1083

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X +2900%

30

GeForce GT 1030

1

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X +828%

65

GeForce GT 1030

7

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X +566%

80

GeForce GT 1030

12

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce GT 1030

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

May 2017

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1228 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1468 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1502 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

2GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR5

4096bit

Memory Bus

64bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

48.06GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

3

4096

Shading Units

384

256

TMUs

24

64

ROPs

16

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

512 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

23.49 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

35.23 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

17.62 GFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1127 GFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

35.23 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W

TDP

30W

600 W

Suggested PSU

200 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GP108

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

GP108-300-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

28 nm

Process Size

14 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

1.8 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

6.1

6.3

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA L20

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA NVS 810

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 PRO

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 5970

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 550X 640SP

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation

Related News

1

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

2

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

3

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

4

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

5

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

6

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

7

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

8

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

9

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

10

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early