Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +3247%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
69W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT215
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy