CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (170W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+261%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760
2.378 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 FURY X
+211%
5173
GeForce GTX 760
1660
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
GeForce GTX 760
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1152
256
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.77 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.07 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.378 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GK104
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
170W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4520
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GP104
7
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro W5000
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 550 512SP
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy