AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 280.3GB/s)

2048 additional rendering cores

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock2635MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (176W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 6650 XT +25%

10.79 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

Radeon RX 6650 XT +91%

9897

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X

30

Radeon RX 6650 XT +26%

38

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X

65

Radeon RX 6650 XT +18%

77

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

Radeon RX 6650 XT +48%

119

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

Radeon RX 6650 XT

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

May 2022

Pirate Islands

Generation

Navi II

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2055 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2635 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

2190 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

280.3GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

64

Compute Units

32

4096

Shading Units

2048

256

TMUs

128

64

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

32

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

2 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

168.6 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

337.3 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

21.59 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.79 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

674.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

Navi 23

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

Navi 23 KXT (215-130000136)

GCN 3.0

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

7 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

11.06 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

237 mm²

Board Design

275W

TDP

176W

600 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

-

6.3

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4730

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V8800

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon 550X 640SP

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

2

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

3

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

4

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

5

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

6

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

7

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

8

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

9

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

10

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales