Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +188%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2019
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
TU117
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy