Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +1282%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
236W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
GT200
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy