Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +157%
8.602 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Tahiti
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy