Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8.602 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +167%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
4096
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
AD104
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy