Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
2
64
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
VSA-101
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy