Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon R9 M270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M270X and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1200MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M270X
1.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +60%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Saturn
GPU Name
TU117
Saturn PRO (216-0843044)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy