Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M275X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M275X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M275X +393%
1.184 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2010
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
160
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Venus
GPU Name
Seymour
Venus XTX (216-0846033)
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy