Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M280X vs AMD FirePro M5950

AMD Radeon R9 M280X vs AMD FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M280X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M280X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M280X +157%
1.792 TFLOPS
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
6
896
Shading Units
480
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
112.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Saturn
GPU Name
Whistler
Saturn XT (216-0843024)
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy