Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M280X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

AMD Radeon R9 M280X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M280X and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M280X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1532MHz vs 1000MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M280X +52%
1.792 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2015
Release Date
May 2017
Gem System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
112.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Saturn
GPU Name
GP108
Saturn XT (216-0843024)
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy