Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (975MHz vs 657MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +97%
1.997 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760A
1.009 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 700A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
628 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.51 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1009 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.05 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GK106
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
N14E-GL-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy