Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (1485MHz vs 900MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X
2.304 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +31%
3.041 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Neptune
GPU Name
TU116
Neptune XT (216-0847000)
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy