Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1590MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X
2.304 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile +111%
4.884 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2019
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1280
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.32 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
152.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.769 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.884 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Neptune
GPU Name
TU116
Neptune XT (216-0847000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy