Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W

AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (930MHz vs 900MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X +38%
2.304 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
720 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.76 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.333 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.667 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.08 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Neptune
GPU Name
TU117
Neptune XT (216-0847000)
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy