AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1006MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
+576%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2014
Release Date
Nov 2017
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
978 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GM108S
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.3
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
