Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 174.3GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
3.482 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +838%
32.69 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
2048
Shading Units
9728
128
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
AD103
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net