Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs AMD FirePro M2000

AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X +516%
2.961 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Jul 2012
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
480
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Turks
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy