AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M295X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X
+189%
2.961 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2014
Release Date
Jul 2012
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Heathrow
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
