Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X +271%
2.961 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GP108B
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy