Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X
2.961 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +201%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
AD107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy