Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M380 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M380 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M380 +540%
1.536 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2010
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
160
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
Seymour
Strato PRO
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy