Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M385X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385X +721%
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2010
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
160
56
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
Seymour
Strato XT
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy