AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M2000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition
+308%
1.962 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jul 2012
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
30.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
61.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.962 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
122.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Turks
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
