Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M7740

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M7740

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 54.14GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M7740 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +259%
2.989 TFLOPS
FirePro M7740
0.832 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2009
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
846 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
54.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
8
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
832.0 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
M97
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
M97XT-GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy