Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W4150M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W4150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4150M 's Advantages
Boost Clock850MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +358%
2.989 TFLOPS
FirePro W4150M
0.652 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
850 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
6
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
652.8 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Mars
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy