Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +2617%
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.148 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.592 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
110.1 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.176 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GF119
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N12M-GS
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy