Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 805A

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 805A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 805A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 805A 's Advantages
Boost Clock758MHz
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +927%
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce 805A
0.291 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 800A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
719 MHz
-
Boost Clock
758 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
16.02GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.064 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.13 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
291.1 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.13 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GK208
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy