Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 920A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +307%
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce 920A
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2015
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 900A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
16.02GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GK208B
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N16V-GM
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy