Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2004
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
NV41
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy